Vegetation Function Network supported by Australian Research Council and Landcare Research NZ
9. Chronosequences, old soils and the properties of species on them

Being organised by David Wardle and Duane Peltzer, Landcare Research NZ

First meeting Jan 29-Feb 1 2007, at Lincoln NZ

PARTICIPANTS
Troy Baisden, Landcare Research, moving to GNS in November (baisdent@landcareresearch.co.nz)
Richard Bardgett; University of Lancaster ( r.bardgett@lancaster.ac.uk)
Oliver Chadwick, UC Santa Barbara ( oac@geog.ucsb.edu)
Leo Condron, Lincoln University ( condronl@lincoln.ac.nz)
Roger Parfitt, Landcare Research ( parfittr@landcareresearch.co.nz)
Duane Peltzer, Landcare Research ( peltzerd@landcareresearch.co.nz)
Stephen Porder, Stanford University ( sporder@stanford.edu)
Sarah Richardson, Landcare Research ( richardsons@landcareresearch.co.nz)
Vicki Allison, Landcare Research ( Allisonv@landcareresearch.co.nz)
Ben Turner, Smithsonian Institute ( TurnerBL@si.edu)
Peter Vitousek, Stanford University ( vitousek@stanford.edu)
Joe Walker, CSIRO ( joseph.walker@csiro.au)
Lars Walker, Univ of Nevada ( walker@unlv.nevada.edu)
David Wardle, Swedish Univ of Agric Sciences ( david.wardle@svek.slu.se)

 

 

see list ...

Soil chronosequences are excellent model systems for testing ideas surrounding ecosystem development. Recent reviews by Wardle et al. (2004, Science 305:509-513) and Vitousek (2004, Nutrient cycling and limitation; Princeton University Press) demonstrate that ecosystem properties and processes follow somewhat predictable long-term trajectories across contrasting systems, in that they are driven is being driven initially by N limitation but ultimately by P limitation. Chronosequences offer a unique opportunity to explore or resolve many outstanding issues in ecology, including: what is the role of organic N and P nutrient sources for maintaining primary productivity or promoting plant species coexistence? Under what conditions should we expect retrogressive (i.e., decline) phases in ecosystem properties to develop? A symposium followed by a working group was held 29th Jan -- 1st Feb 2007. Here are the speakers and topics at the symposium:

David Wardle (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences): Introduction to workshop.
Rob Allen (Science Leader, Landcare Research): Overview of the ARC-NZ Vegetation Network.
Thomas W. Walker (Christchurch): Introductory remarks.
Lawrence Walker ( University of Nevada): Predicting and reversing retrogression: autogenic change in a disturbed world.
Joe Walker (CSIRO): The Cooloola chronosequence and retrogression.
Peter Vitousek (Stanford University): Sources and sinks of nutrients during long-term ecosystem development.
Rob Allen (Landcare Research): Forest dynamics across the Waitutu marine terrace chronosequence.
Sarah Richardson (Landcare Research): Plant strategies and plant traits on retrogressive soils.
Duane Peltzer (Landcare Research): Shifts in plant traits along soil chronosequences.
Leo Condron ( Lincoln University) Changes in the chemical nature of soil organic P on the Franz Josef chronosequence.
Vicki Allison (Landcare Research): Controls on enzyme activity and efficiency along nutrient gradients at the Franz Josef chronosequence.
David Wardle (Swedish Univ of Agric Sciences): Aboveground and belowground responses to ecosystem retrogression.
Richard Bardgett (Univ. of Lancaster): Soil microbial community development during ecosystem build-up and decline.
Roger Parfitt (Landcare Research): Nitrogen and phosphorus in New Zealand forest soils.
Troy Baisden (GNS): Linking C, N and P as soils age: towards understanding the bulk of evolutionary time.
Ben Turner (Smithsonian Institute): The chronosequence concept and the paradox of hyper-diverse tropical forests. Oliver Chadwick (UC Santa Barbara): Mineral transformations as soils age: impact on carbon and trace metal availability.
Steven Porder (Stanford University): What do chronosequences tell us about the larger landscape?
Duane Peltzer (Landcare Research): Synthesis and wrap-up.